Ross Investigators PC, Inc.

  • Home
  • About
  • For Attorneys
    • Aerial Videography Using Unmanned Aircraft
    • Process of Service
    • Responsible Party Identification
    • Witness Locates and Interviews
  • For Businesses
    • Workplace Investigations
    • Competitive Intelligence
    • Aerial Videography Using Unmanned Aircraft
  • For Individuals
    • Background Investigations
    • Surveillance
    • Fidelity Investigations
  • Blog
  • Reviews
  • Home
  • About
  • For Attorneys
    • Aerial Videography Using Unmanned Aircraft
    • Process of Service
    • Responsible Party Identification
    • Witness Locates and Interviews
  • For Businesses
    • Workplace Investigations
    • Competitive Intelligence
    • Aerial Videography Using Unmanned Aircraft
  • For Individuals
    • Background Investigations
    • Surveillance
    • Fidelity Investigations
  • Blog
  • Reviews

Denver Private Investigator’s Blog

Colorado Department of Regulatory Agency 2019 Sunset Review recommends the General Assembly sunset the Colorado Private Investigator Licensing Program

11/27/2019

 
Picture
Colorado sunset photo by Susanna Speier
By Susanna Speier
Denver Private Investigator Blogger 

On October 15, 2019, the Department of Regulatory Agencies announced the completion of a year-long review of Colorado's mandatory private investigator licensing law that took effect in 2015. The review concluded that the licensing law was unnecessary due to lack of demonstratable harm.In other words, because the licensing program did not protect the public from any documented harm or risk of harm DORA recommended the mandatory licensing law be repealed by September of 2020.

See also: investigators weigh in on when to withhold a report and when not to.

In their November newsletter the Professional Private Investigators Association of Colorado (PPIAC) Vice President of Legislation, Robert Orozco announced the PPIAC's commitment to supporting and maintaining the mandatory licensing law for as long as possible. Disagreeing with the conclusion of DORA's Sunset Review, PPIAC Chair John Morris and members with specific examples of ethical violations from licensed and unlicensed private investigators have come forth with grievances. The PPIAC has also hired a lobbyist to work to maintain the program. 

We will be posting updates on legislative hearings in the new year. Want to read DORA's sunset review? Go here for the full report. 

Investigators weigh in on when to withhold an investigative report and when not to

7/15/2019

 
By Susanna Speier
Denver Private Investigator Blog 

The Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA) hasn't provided additional documentation regarding the case that drove them to issue Grand Junction Private Investigator, Jessica Erin Lane a letter of admonishment. Hopefully additional information will be available soon.

See also: Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies issues Admonishment to Grand Junction private investigator after investigator refuses to provide investigation report

Meanwhile, private investigators from all over the country, responded with examples of when, in their practice, they might deny an investigative report to a client who requested it. Many states including the State of Colorado, require private investigators submit reports in order to keep their licenses. A cursory review of the Colorado license requirements confirms this is a requirements that needs to be specified in the contract. Screenshots obtained from the Colorado Secretary of State's Office are are circles in red. 
To start with the basics, Virginia based private investigator, Kimberly Williamson defines report as "a blurb that says 'this is what we did, this is how long it took and here are the next steps.'" She says she the investigation report provides clients with, "some kind of narrative or summary with expense reports." Most cases that are paid for, invoiced and completed follow this formula. 

Williamson once worked "with a guy who offered a significant amount of money for a home address of a vehicle that made him mad during traffic. He said he wanted to send a guy adult toys or some nonsense," and that was a situation that needed to be handled differently. 

Although "work product is the juicy details, photos, or the generated background/address info," it is Virginia state law not to "hand work product to someone whom we discover or suspect of being under a protective order." The same pertains to a client who is under a retraining order or who may be self-injurious. In such circumstances, Williamson explains, the private investigator may still supply the information to the attorney or to the therapist of the client. If the private investigator needs to terminate the contract, the PI will "send a copy of the signed contract with the violation highlighted and a letter advising them that x, y, and z were performed and what led to termination." 

“My client always gets a report, as long as the invoice is paid,” explains Oklahoma City based investigator, Brian Bates when asked about circumstances that would cause a gumshoe to preclude a client from seeing or receiving a final report. "I have very few clients on terms and most provide a retainer. That said, getting a report does not mean the client gets all my work product," he explains. 

For Bates, recording everything is key. "I audio record all my interactions for my benefit. I do not turn those over unless it becomes necessary or relevant to do so. I also keep my own personal notes and I do not turn those over - I use my notes however as a basis for the report I give the client." 
Picture
Thanks to recording technologies evolving from the early dictagraph days (pictured above) it is easier than ever before to inconspicuously record a conversation. Bates insists that the "audio recording feature of my Apple Watch is a life saver," saying "no one questions it the way they question a phone or recording pen."
Picture

"I also track myself while on a case (car tracker and smart phone tracker) and shoot timestamped photos randomly. Unless required as part of a surveillance job, I do not turn those over," he explains. 

Why then such painstaking efforts to document information that wont even be included in the report? "The main reason I record all interactions is for liability reasons," Bates explains, is that "people lie - a lot. Recordings have saved me from arrest more than once." 

See also: the Denver Private Investigator Blog talks process server safety with Tom Mills 

While there is no known correlation between the Admonishment that the Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies issued to the Grand Junction investigator ---case currently remain unknown as no additional supporting documentation has been made available-- and the examples in this article, the report is still a vital part of the job for Bates who says, "my client gets a report, as long as the invoice is paid."

Recordings protect private eyes anytime their side of the story is contested and Bates is emphatic that "people lie - a lot. "Recordings have saved me from arrest more than once. Had the FBI stop me once as I was leaving a town in Oklahoma. All because the person I interviewed, that was involved in a federal case, realized he shouldn’t have talked to me. He called the FBI agent he had been working with and lied and told him I identified myself as a federal agent. I was detained and only released after I was able to play back audio of our meeting - where I clearly gave the man a card and told him I was a private investigator.”

See also: felony menacing charge 

Bates’ example is not dissimilar in what happened to Colorado process server, Tom Mills when he served papers to an off-duty Denver Sheriff’s Deputy in Adams County, Colorado and it was ultimately the video recording he made of of an off-duty Sheriff’s Deputy pointing a gun at him that he used to prove his innocence. 

    Subscribe Here!

    Enter your email to activate your FREE bimonthly subscription to the Denver Private Investigator Blog.
Submit

Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies issues Admonishment to Grand Junction private investigator after investigator refuses to provide investigation report

7/14/2019

 
By Susanna Speier,
Denver Private Investigator Blogger 

Jessica Erin Lane of Grand Junction, Colorado, located in Mesa County received a letter of admonition issued by Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA) program director, Mark Browne on January 7, 2019 stating “the director determined that the facts disclosed do not warrant the commencement of formal disciplinary proceedings against your private investigator license. However, the Director has ordered this Letter of Admonition be issued to your pursuant to section 12-58.5 (1), C.R.S.”

See also: Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies issues admonishment to Texas based Colorado private investigator licensee
 
If you'd like to brush up and/or refresh on the latest tweaks to licensing regulations, you'll find the full legalese rundown on the Justia website and Mark Brown's letter specifying the Lane's licensing violations are pasted below.

According to the two bullet points and their parenthetical (but considerably more layman-friendly) summaries, the admonishment is for “failing to complete the contracted investigation and failing to provide report of investigation.”

See also: report writing for Private Investigators 
 
It is unclear from the document obtained why Lane did not complete the investigation and/or produce the report. As Lane never issued a response, the admonishment must remain a stand-alone document of what happened. The segment of the letter, pictured below, also states the admonishment will be available in the public records which is how the Denver Private Investigator Blog obtained it. 

Picture
According to her Linkedin profile, Lane has worked for the Defense Investigators Group (DIG) The Robison Group and Marden Investigation Company and has 18 years of experience in investigations and legal fields. "I have built, directed, supervised and managed a successful investigation agency for 10 years," she states in her Linkedin summary. 

Reports are a vital part of an investigation. Especially if it is a legal investigation requiring consistency and clarity to ensure the attorneys, judges and juries are able to connect dots of seemingly disparate trails of evidence and testimonies.

To reiterate, it is unclear from this document why Lane did not complete the investigation by providing her client with a report at the end of the assignment. This particular article, however does not need to end as Lane is welcome to contact and share her side of the story with the Denver Private Investigator Blog so we better understand what the dynamics between her and the client were that lead to the admonishment being issued. We can, of course, be reached through the website and through all of our social media channels which now include Instagram, Facebook and Twitter. 


    Subscribe Here!

    Enter your email to activate your FREE bimonthly subscription to the Denver Private Investigator Blog.
Submit

Denver law firm representing plaintiffs in defective eclipse glasses class action lawsuit

8/30/2017

 
Picture
Photo by NASA's Carla Thomas
By Susanna Speier
Denver Private Investigator Blogger

The bad news is that the most viewed eclipse in history resulted in permanent eye injuries for people who purchased counterfeit or defective eclipse glasses on Amazon. The good news? If your eyes were fried by last month's eclipse, there is now a class action personal injury lawsuit pending and one of the law firms representing the plaintiffs is the Hannon Law Firm, LLC which is conveniently located on Downing Street in Denver, Colorado. 

The class action lawsuit against Amazon was filed on August 29th by a Charleston, South Carolina couple who sustained eye injuries after viewing the August 21st eclipse. The compensation is an undisclosed amount that will exceed $75,000 according to the Class Action Complaint on file.  "Corey Payne and Kayla Harris said they experienced headaches and vision impairment after using the glasses to watch the US eclipse on 21 August," reported the BBC last week.

Amazon issued a recall on August 10th, however the South Carolina couple says they were not notified in time and ended up viewing the eclipse through defective glasses. The couple experienced headaches, watery eyes and dizziness in the hours following the eclipse and reported experiencing distorted vision during the days that followed. 

According to PBS digital science producer, Nsikan Akpan
, Amazon had been offering to reimburse customers who purchased defective glasses before the eclipse however Amazon refused to list names of the vendors carrying the faulty products.


The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) provided information to the public on how to obtain ISO and ISO 12312-2 compliant glasses. The American Astronomical Society (AAS) also issued a list specifying credible eclipse glasses retailers vendors along with credible sources for camera lens solar filters. 

According to ABC, "Paper Optics" was one of the manufacturers responsible for selling products that resulted in eye damage however, the name of the manufacturer is not specified on the Class Action Complaint and
Amazon currently carries a number of American Paper Optics product listings with no mention of the lawsuit. An Amazon sellers forum, however, is discussing the lawsuit. 

On their website, American Paper Optics claims to be ISO certified and tested. The company is also first on the AAS list of safe manufacturers. A safety notification on American Paper Optics' website however illustrates the visual characteristics that distinguish real from counterfeit eclipse glasses. 

"American Paper Optics" is a Tennessee based company who, according to TopClassActionsDOTcom "projected it would make and sell 100 million pairs of eclipse glasses, about 10 million of which were sold to Amazon. 

"
Amazon attempted to recall these Amazon eclipse glasses in an email announcement sent out Aug. 19, two days before the eclipse. The email stated that the supplier of Amazon eclipse glasses could not confirm that they were produced by a recommended manufacturer. Amazon recommended that people not use the glasses to view the eclipse.

The plaintiffs say this recall announcement was “tragically too little, too late.” Despite the allegedly inadequate email announcement, plaintiffs and their proposed Class Members still used these Amazon eclipse glasses to view the eclipse, exposing themselves to eye damage.

Payne says he bought a three-pack of eclipse glasses from Amazon on Aug. 1. He and Harris, his fiancée, say they never got notice of the Amazon eclipse glasses recall before they used these glasses to watch the eclipse."

"The safety of solar eclipse glasses was a major concern of astronomy experts in the weeks leading up to the much-watched event," according to MarketWatch, "Third-party online vendors, such as Amazon and eBay, EBAY...  monitored their sites for counterfeit solar eclipse glasses, removing posts and refunding customers for glasses that were not compliant with safety standards, both companies told MarketWatch," when interviewed for the story. 

​The 
United States district court document excerpt is attached below. The complete document was obtained through Geekwire and you can click through to view that document in full. We'd love to hear your thoughts on the case.

A screenshot of American Paper Optics' warning is also included along with a link to their website. It is still unclear whether the glasses the plaintiffs purchased through Amazon were counterfeit or defective, however we expect to be learning more shortly.
Picture
Picture

    ​Subscribe Here!

    Enter your email to activate your FREE bimonthly subscription to the Denver Private Investigator Blog.
Submit

Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies issues admonishment to Texas based Colorado private investigator licensee

5/25/2017

 
Picture
Picture
y Susanna Speier
Denver Private Investigator Blogger 

On or about January 26, 2017, Colorado’s Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA) reviewed a complaint regarding Patrick Baird, a Granbury, Texas based private investigator who has held a Colorado level 2 license since June 16, 2015.
 
According to public records, around September 26, 2016, Baird pled guilty to calling and leaving over twenty voicemail messages with a client in a single afternoon. The Harris County District Court in the State of Texas sentenced him to two days of confinement and a $250 fine.
 
Baird admitted the violations to DORA’s Office of Private Investigator Licensure Program Director, Mark Browne who cited several licensing regulation sections including 12-58.5-109 which includes stalking and failing to meet generally accepted standards of practice in private investigation.
 
After he was fined an additional $250 by the State of Colorado --plus an additional 15% surcharge, bringing his total Colorado fees to $287.50-- Baird was issued an Admonishment for failing to meet generally accepted standards of the practice of private investigations.
 
He was warned that such conduct would lead to formal action against his license including probation, suspension or revocation, should it recur.  

DORA and the Colorado Open Records Act (CORA) require disclosure of public documents which, according to their website, "are generally defined as an existing written or electronic document made, maintained or kept by a state agency for use in a government function or purpose." 

The Order, signed by Baird as well as Browne, is now a public record in the custody of the Director which is how it was obtained for the article. 

    Subscribe Here!

    ​Enter your email to activate your FREE bimonthly subscription to the Denver Private Investigator Blog.
Submit
    Featured on PInow.com - Top - Investigator - Blogs

      Sign-up!

    Submit
    Sign-up for email alerts to follow the latest developments in the world of private investigators.

    Archives

    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    September 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    December 2018
    October 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015

    Categories

    All
    2017
    2018
    2019
    2020
    Accident
    Accident Reconstruction
    ACTAR
    Adams County
    Agatha Christie
    Airbnb
    Amazon
    Animal Rescue
    Animals
    Animatronic Spies
    Apple Watch
    Arizona
    Aspen
    Attorney
    Aurora
    Background Check
    Background Checks
    Background Investigation
    Best
    Best Private Investigator Blogs
    Black And White Challenge
    Black-cube
    Black History Month
    Bobcat Ridge
    Books
    Boulder
    Breckinridge
    Bret Carbone
    Broomfield
    Bureau Of Labor And Statistics
    Business Spy
    California
    Camera
    Car Insurance Fraud
    Castle Rock
    Cats
    CBA
    CC
    Cenntennial
    Census
    Cheating
    Cheating Spouses
    Christmas Gifts
    Chris Wells
    CIA
    Claim History
    Class Action
    Clyfford Still Museum
    Cold Case
    Collision
    Colorado
    Colorado Bar
    Colorado Department Of Regulatory Agencies
    Colorado Department Or Regulatory Agencies
    Colorado Gifts
    Colorado Holiday Gifts
    Colorado Law
    Colorado Law Firm
    Colorado Lawyer
    Colorado PI
    Colorado Private Investigator
    Colorado Private Investigators
    Colorado Springs
    Colorado Women's Bar Association
    Commerce City
    Computer Forensics
    Concealed Carry
    Conference
    Crime
    Criminology
    Cybersecurity
    Cyber Security
    Cyber Spires
    Data
    Date Night
    Denver
    Denver PI
    Denver Press Club
    Denver Private Investigator
    Denver Private Investigator Blogger
    Denver Private Investigators
    Denver Private Investigator Training
    Denver Security
    Department Of Regulatory Agencies
    Detective
    Detective Gifts
    Detectives
    Digital Forensics
    DNA
    Dog
    DORA
    Douglas County
    Downtown Denver
    Drone
    Drones
    Drone Surveillance
    Durango
    Eclipse
    Englewood
    Espionage
    Estes Park
    Ethics
    Events
    Evidence
    Facebook
    FBI
    Fenrir Recovery
    Film And Television
    Film Noir
    Firearms
    Forensic Examiner
    Forensic Meteorology
    Forensics
    Fort Collins
    Fraud
    Ft Collins
    Gift Ideas
    Gift Ideas For Private Investigators
    Gift Ideas For Spies
    Gifts
    Grand Junction
    Greenwood Village
    Gun
    Harassment
    Harry And Meghan
    Harvey Weinstein
    History
    Holiday
    Holiday Ornaments
    Holidays
    Impression Evidence
    Income
    Infidelity
    Injured
    Injuries
    Injury
    Innocence Project
    Instagram
    Insurance Fraud
    International Spy Museum
    Interview
    Interviewing
    Interviews
    Investigation
    Investigation Contract
    Investigation Report
    Investigations
    Investigative Contract
    Investigator
    Iphone
    Jessica Jones
    Judicial Center
    Kansas
    Ken Bone
    Kids
    Law Day
    Law Firm
    Lawyer
    Legal
    Legal Investigation
    Legal Investigator
    Legal Investigators
    LGBT
    Licensing
    Licensing Fees
    Littleton
    Llama
    Lone Tree
    Louisville
    Loveland
    Masonville
    Meghan And Harry
    Memoir
    Mesa County
    Military Intelligence
    Military Spy
    Missing Person
    Missing Persons
    Monument
    Movies
    NALI
    Nancy Drew
    Nebraska
    New Mexico
    Noir
    Parker
    Party
    Personal Injury
    Personal Injury Lawsuit
    Personal Injury Lawyer
    Pet Investigations
    Pets
    Photography
    PI
    P.I. Cruises
    Pit Bull
    Police
    Police Interviews
    Polygraph Tests
    PPIAC
    Private Detective
    Private Eye
    Private Investigator
    Private Investigator App
    Private Investigator Blog
    Private Investigator Books
    Private Investigator Cameras
    Private Investigator Conferences
    Private Investigator Near Me
    Private Investigators
    Private Investigator Training
    Process Server
    Process Servers
    Process Service
    Process Serving
    Professional Private Investigator Association Of Colorado
    PTSD
    Pueblo
    Reid Technique
    Report Writing
    Rocky Mountain
    Rocky Mountains
    Ross Investigators
    Russia
    Safety
    Salary
    Security
    Sexual Assault
    Sheriff
    Sherlock Holmes
    Slip And Fall
    Sloan's Lake
    Sloans Lake
    Social Media
    Solar Eclipse
    Spies
    Spy
    Spy Camera
    Spy Cameras
    Spy Gifts
    Spy History
    Spy Museum
    Spy Store
    Stalkscan
    Steamboat Springs
    Surveillance
    Texas
    Theater
    The Spy Shop
    Tom Mills
    Top Private Investigator Blogs
    Traffic Accident
    Training
    Trauma
    Trustify
    Uber
    Utah
    Valentines Day
    Vehicle
    Verification
    Video
    Videos
    Watson
    Weather
    Westminster
    When They See Us
    Wildlife
    Witness Interviews
    Wyoming

    RSS Feed

Home
About
For Attorneys
For Businesses
For Individuals
Reviews
Blog

Contact
Ross Investigators in Denver, Colorado
Highly experienced team of Denver private investigators serving attorneys, businesses, and individuals. Our investigation services include, but are not limited to: process of service, responsible party identification, witness locates and interviews, workplace investigations, competitive intelligence, background investigations, surveillance investigations, fidelity investigations (infidelity), cheating spouses, aerial video, & more. Ross Investigators PC, Inc. proudly offers their PI services to: Arvada, Aurora, Boulder, Broomfield, Castle Rock, Centennial, Cherry Creek, Colorado Springs, Commerce City, Denver, Englewood, Fort Collins, Glendale, Golden, Greenwood Village, Highlands Ranch, Littleton, Longmont, Louisville, Loveland, Morrison, Northglenn, Parker, Pueblo, Superior, Thornton, Washington Park, and all of Colorado.
Visit Us On Facebook
Follow Us On Twitter